Perceived challenges of COVID-19 infection prevention and control preparedness: A multinational survey
Author(s) -
Ermira Tartari,
Joost Hopman,
Benedetta Allegranzi,
Bin Gao,
Andreas F. Widmer,
Vincent ChiChung Cheng,
ShukChing Wong,
Kalisvar Marimuthu,
Folasade Ogunsola,
Andreas Voß
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.917
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 2213-7173
pISSN - 2213-7165
DOI - 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.07.002
Subject(s) - preparedness , pandemic , infection control , covid-19 , outbreak , transmission (telecommunications) , health care , multinational corporation , environmental health , medicine , control (management) , disease control , transmissibility (structural dynamics) , business , disease , virology , intensive care medicine , economic growth , political science , infectious disease (medical specialty) , computer science , law , pathology , finance , artificial intelligence , telecommunications , quantum mechanics , vibration , physics , vibration isolation , economics
Objectives Implementation of effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is needed to support global capacity building to limit transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and mitigate its impact on health systems. We assessed the perceptions of healthcare workers on the current global IPC preparedness measures for COVID-19. Methods A cross-sectional survey using an electronic survey was circulated between February 26, 2020, and March 20, 2020, to IPC professionals during COVID-19 pandemic. The survey addressed the presence of COVID-19 guidelines as well as specific IPC preparedness activities in response to the outbreak. Findings In total, 339 IPC professionals spanning 63 countries in all 6 World Health Organization (WHO) regions, mostly from tertiary care centres participated. Of all participants, 66·6% were aware of the existence of national guidelines to prevent COVID-19. A shortage of PPE supplies was reported by 48% (ranging from 64·2% in low-income countries to 27·4% in high-income countries); 41·5% of respondents considered that the media had an impact on guideline development and 63·6% believed that guidelines were based on maximum security rather than on evidence-based analyses. 58·5% and 72·7% of participants believed that healthcare facilities and community settings respectively were not sufficiently prepared. Conclusion Results revealed lack of guidelines and concerns over insufficient PPE supply in both high- and low-income countries. Our findings should alert national health authorities to ramp up the implementation of IPC measures and focus on long-term preparedness and readiness for future pandemics, likely requiring government funds rather than reliance on healthcare institutions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom