Premium
A dual‐process model of brand extension: Taxonomic feature‐based and thematic relation‐based similarity independently drive brand extension evaluation
Author(s) -
Estes Zachary,
Gibbert Michael,
Guest Duncan,
Mazursky David
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of consumer psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.433
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1532-7663
pISSN - 1057-7408
DOI - 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.002
Subject(s) - brand extension , extension (predicate logic) , similarity (geometry) , dual (grammatical number) , product (mathematics) , thematic map , process (computing) , brand management , relation (database) , thematic analysis , feature (linguistics) , computer science , psychology , marketing , image (mathematics) , mathematics , qualitative research , data mining , artificial intelligence , business , linguistics , sociology , philosophy , cartography , programming language , geography , operating system , social science , geometry
The success of a brand extension depends largely on the similarity between the brand and its extension product. Recent psychological and neuroscientific evidence supports a dual‐process model that distinguishes taxonomic feature‐based similarity from thematic relation‐based similarity. In addition to providing a parsimonious organizational framework for prior brand extension research, this dual‐process model also provides novel predictions about the processing and evaluation of taxonomic brand extensions (e.g., Budweiser cola) and thematic brand extensions (e.g., Budweiser chips). Results indicate that taxonomic and thematic similarities independently contribute to branding professionals' and lay consumers' evaluations of real and hypothetical brand extensions (Studies 1A and 1B). Counter‐intuitively, thematic brand extensions are processed more rapidly (Study 2), judged more novel, and evaluated more positively than taxonomic extensions (Study 3). When induced to consider the commonalities between the brand and the extension product, however, taxonomic extensions are judged more novel and evaluated more positively (Study 3). Implications for brand extension and marketing more generally are discussed.