Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia | Zendy

Pepijn A. van Diemen | Zendy; Roel S. Driessen | Zendy; Rolf Kooistra | Zendy; Wynand J. Stuijfzand | Zendy; Pieter G. Raijmakers | Zendy; Ronald Boellaard | Zendy; Stefan Schumacher | Zendy; Michiel J. Bom | Zendy; Henk Everaars | Zendy; Ruben W. de Winter | Zendy; Peter M. van de Ven | Zendy; Johan H. C. Reiber | Zendy; James K. Min | Zendy; Jonathan Leipsic | Zendy; Juhani Knuuti | Zendy; Richard Underwood | Zendy; Albert C. van Rossum | Zendy; Ibrahim Danad | Zendy; Paul Knaapen | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia

Author(s) -

Pepijn A. van Diemen,

Roel S. Driessen,

Rolf Kooistra,

Wynand J. Stuijfzand,

Pieter G. Raijmakers,

Ronald Boellaard,

Stefan Schumacher,

Michiel J. Bom,

Henk Everaars,

Ruben W. de Winter,

Peter M. van de Ven,

Johan H. C. Reiber,

James K. Min,

Jonathan Leipsic,

Juhani Knuuti,

Richard Underwood,

Albert C. van Rossum,

Ibrahim Danad,

Paul Knaapen

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

jacc. cardiovascular imaging

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 5.79

H-Index - 120

eISSN - 1936-878X

pISSN - 1876-7591

DOI - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.012

Subject(s) - myocardial perfusion imaging , cardiology , perfusion , medicine , ischemia , perfusion scanning , myocardial ischemia , radiology

This study compared the performance of the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-defined coronary artery disease (CAD).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research