Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Perfusion CMR in Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography | Zendy

Federico E. Mordini | Zendy; Tariq Haddad | Zendy; LiYueh Hsu | Zendy; Peter Kellman | Zendy; Tracy Lowrey | Zendy; Anthony H. Aletras | Zendy; W. Patricia Bandettini | Zendy; Andrew E. Arai | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Perfusion CMR in Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography

Author(s) -

Federico E. Mordini,

Tariq Haddad,

LiYueh Hsu,

Peter Kellman,

Tracy Lowrey,

Anthony H. Aletras,

W. Patricia Bandettini,

Andrew E. Arai

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

jacc. cardiovascular imaging

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 5.79

H-Index - 120

eISSN - 1936-878X

pISSN - 1876-7591

DOI - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.014

Subject(s) - medicine , perfusion , coronary artery disease , dipyridamole , receiver operating characteristic , nuclear medicine , stenosis , perfusion scanning , cardiology , area under the curve , radiology

This study's primary objective was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fully quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) versus a reference standard of quantitative coronary angiography. We hypothesized that fully quantitative analysis of stress perfusion CMR would have high diagnostic accuracy for identifying significant coronary artery stenosis and exceed the accuracy of semiquantitative measures of perfusion and qualitative interpretation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research