z-logo
Premium
P2‐345: DO THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE ESTIMATES FOR CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE DIFFER BY DISEASE SEVERITY?
Author(s) -
Andrews Jeffrey Scott,
Desai Urvi,
Kirson Noam Y.,
Zichlin Miriam,
Ball Daniel,
Matthews Brandy R.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.1035
Subject(s) - clinical dementia rating , minimal clinically important difference , medicine , dementia , cohort , alzheimer's disease , disease , cognition , cognitive decline , clinical endpoint , gerontology , physical therapy , clinical trial , psychiatry , randomized controlled trial
(Animals) verbal fluency scores were stable in half the patients. Phonemic verbal fluency (Letters) was stable in 3 of 5 patients. All patients remained living in the community. Conclusions: We have for the first time demonstrated stabilization of cognition function in MCI and Dementia for up to 15 years of therapy. Combined therapy is a viable treatment option for medically ill people with dementia until new effective medications become available.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here