z-logo
Premium
Accuracy of general hospital dementia diagnoses in England: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of diagnostic accuracy 2008–2016
Author(s) -
Sommerlad Andrew,
Perera Gayan,
SinghManoux Archana,
Lewis Glyn,
Stewart Robert,
Livingston Gill
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.012
Subject(s) - dementia , medicine , gold standard (test) , medical diagnosis , ethnic group , diagnostic accuracy , cohort , retrospective cohort study , psychiatry , pediatrics , emergency medicine , disease , pathology , sociology , anthropology
Recognizing dementia in general hospitals allows for tailored care. We aimed to assess hospital dementia diagnosis accuracy, changes over time, and predictors of correct identification. Method Retrospective cohort study of people over 65 years, using data from a large mental health care database as gold standard, linked to 2008–2016 English hospital data. Results In 21,387 people who had 138,455 admissions, we found sensitivity and specificity of dementia recording, respectively, to be 78.0% and 92.0% for each person's complete records, and 63.3% and 96.6% for each nonelective admission. Diagnostic sensitivity increased between 2008 and 16. Accurate general hospital recording of the presence of dementia was lower in ethnic minority groups, younger, single people, and those with physical illness. Discussion Dementia diagnosis recording in general hospitals is increasing but remains less likely in some groups. Clinicians should be aware of this inequity and have a higher index of clinical suspicion in these groups.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here