[IC‐P‐159]: A COMPARISON OF BRAIN IMAGING MODALITIES AND ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR MEASURES OF CEREBROVASCULAR RESPONSIVENESS | Zendy

Burley Claire V. | Zendy; Mullinger Karen | Zendy; Francis Susan T. | Zendy; Whittaker Anna C. | Zendy; Lucas Samuel J.E. | Zendy

Premium

[IC‐P‐159]: A COMPARISON OF BRAIN IMAGING MODALITIES AND ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR MEASURES OF CEREBROVASCULAR RESPONSIVENESS

Author(s) -

Burley Claire V.,

Mullinger Karen,

Francis Susan T.,

Whittaker Anna C.,

Lucas Samuel J.E.

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

alzheimer's and dementia

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713

H-Index - 118

eISSN - 1552-5279

pISSN - 1552-5260

DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2534

Subject(s) - functional magnetic resonance imaging , magnetic resonance imaging , modality (human–computer interaction) , medicine , modalities , psychology , audiology , nuclear medicine , cardiology , neuroscience , radiology , artificial intelligence , social science , sociology , computer science

Figure 2. Calculating CVR values from fMRI data in 32 healthy individuals. Comparing two different analysis approaches (fMRI: linear regressionvs. TCD: 30-s steady state) applied to fMRI data acquired in two different experimental conditions (stimulus concentration: 5% vs. 7% CO2). Pearson’s correlations revealed significant association of CVRs derived from each analysis approach for both 5% CO2 (r 1⁄4 0.872; p < 0.001) and 7% CO2 (r 1⁄4 0.956; p < 0.001). Claire V. Burley, Karen Mullinger, Susan T. Francis, Anna C. Whittaker, Samuel J. E. Lucas, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Nottingham & University of Birmingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Contact e-mail: cvb469@bham.ac.uk

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research