z-logo
Premium
P4‐370: Eliciting Care Plan and Treatment Goals for Caregivers of Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: a Survey Pilot
Author(s) -
Majid Tabassum,
Asamoah Benedicta,
dosReis Susan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.115
Subject(s) - stakeholder , family caregivers , psychology , test (biology) , dementia , medicine , disease , gerontology , family medicine , paleontology , public relations , political science , biology , pathology
Background: Care plans for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) often require input from family caregivers, yet prioritizing treatment outcomes and benefit-risk tradeoffs for care are often assessed by health care professionals. Preference elicitation methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE) methods allow the assessment of trade-offs for competing treatment and care plan options as well as an understanding of what might be negotiable in care plans for family caregivers. Objective: Our objective was to both develop and test a family-centered survey instrument to identify care plan priorities for family caregivers of individuals with ADRD. Methods: We used a mixed methods approach to identify and refine this survey instrument. The survey included a DCE instrument based on five attributes of treatment outcomes. Each attribute had three levels. A total of 15 choice-task profiles were shown and seven of the statements were displayed in a profile. Caregivers selected one most and one least important outcome from each choice-task profile that displayed six statements. Family caregivers (N1⁄425) completed the survey instrument, and treatment outcome priorities were assessed using mean best-worst scores (U). Mean U were ranked to by relative importance of outcome preferences. Feasibility was assessed via t-tests and 95% confidence intervals. Results:Overall participants were mostly white, female, and over 50% were caring for spouses at any stage of ADRD. Key stakeholder engagement was used to confirm relevance and definitions of the outcome goals for a larger sample in Summer 2016. From the pilot study, outcomes considered most important were: support from family members (U 0.18), participation in physical and occupational therapy (U 0.1), and living in a community with caregiving support (U 0.1). Least important outcomes were taking medication for behavior (U -0.1), medication to treat memory loss (U -0.07), and medication to treat mood (U -0.12), which are often recommended, yet might not be suitable to every individual or family caregiver. Conclusions: Using this approach can inform future care plans as well as shared decision making throughout ADRD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here