Premium
P1‐231: NEUROSTRUCTURAL CORRELATES OF COGNITION IN DEMENTIA WITH LEWY BODIES: A VBM‐DARTEL STUDY
Author(s) -
Colloby Sean J.,
Rabee Riham,
O'Brien John,
Taylor JohnPaul
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.470
Subject(s) - dementia with lewy bodies , voxel based morphometry , voxel , basal forebrain , clinical dementia rating , grey matter , white matter , psychology , temporal cortex , dementia , audiology , neuroscience , hippocampus , medicine , orbitofrontal cortex , magnetic resonance imaging , cognition , cholinergic , radiology , cognitive impairment , prefrontal cortex , disease
Background: The substantia innominata (SI) forms part of the basal forebrain that provides major cholinergic innervation to the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, and has an essential role in cognitive function. Cholinergic loss is a central feature of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and contributes to the clinical symptom phenotype. The objective was to investigate grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) changes in the SI from magnetic resonance (MR) images in DLB, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy older subjects using voxel-based morphometry (VBM).Methods:One hundred and twenty seven subjects’ (39 controls, 48 AD, 41 DLB) underwent 3T T1 MR imaging as well as clinical and cognitive assessments. VBM was undertaken using SPM8 and used a SI mask image to define the brain volume subspace for voxel analyses. Group differences in GM andWMvolumes and selected behavioural correlates were assessed using the general linear model, with age and total intracranial volume as nuisance variables. Effects were identified using an uncorrected threshold of P uncorrected 0.05, followed by family-wise error (FWE) correction for multiple comparisons (P FWE 0.05) within the SI volume subspace. Results: Relative to controls, VBM analysis revealed significant bilateral GM loss in the SI in both AD and DLB (P FWE 0.05); however, these deficits were more pronounced in DLB. Compared to controls, significant WM loss (P FWE 0.05) was also observed bilaterally in AD but not in DLB. In DLB, significant correlations were found withMMSE and CAF scores on GMvolume (P FWE 0.05). Conclusions: In DLB, GM loss is more pronounced in the SI than in AD and appears to be associated with dementia severity and cognitive fluctuations. GM atrophy of the SI may shed light in understanding some of the clinical manifestations of DLB, while relative preservation of WM volume could also have positive implications for cholinergic intervention.