z-logo
Premium
P3‐362: DEMENTIA AND LONG‐TERM CARE: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON GERMAN HEALTH INSURANCE DATA
Author(s) -
Fink Anne,
Doblhammer Gabriele
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1456
Subject(s) - medicine , dementia , hazard ratio , long term care , proportional hazards model , incidence (geometry) , german , emergency medicine , gerontology , pediatrics , disease , psychiatry , confidence interval , physics , archaeology , optics , history
The aim of this study is to investigate patients’ transitions to long-term care (LTC) following a diagnosis of incident dementia, and to determine whether these transitions differ depending on the type of physician who made the initial diagnosis: a general practitioner (GP) or a neurologist/psychiatrist (NP). Longitudinal claims data of the AOK are analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, a piecewise constant model, and temporary life table computations for the risk of needing LTC after the diagnosis of dementia incidence based on the diagnosing physician and the antidementia drug treatment prescribed. NP patients have a significantly reduced risk of needing LTC relative to GP patients. After a diagnosis of incident dementia, NP patients live two to 5.2 months longer without LTC than GP patients. Antidementia drug treatment has an adverse effect on LTC, while patients who are prescribed antidementia medication have an increased risk of needing LTC. Patients diagnosed by an NP have certain advantages relative to patients diagnosed by a GP. Further research is needed to determine whether these advantages are attributable to earlier detection or to different treatment regimens.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here