z-logo
Premium
P3‐424: High‐dose 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine transdermal patch demonstrates efficacy on instrumental activities of daily living: Individual item analysis
Author(s) -
Cummings Jeffrey,
Grossberg George,
Alva Gustavo,
Caputo Angelika,
Downs Pamela,
Strohmaier Christine
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2098
Subject(s) - rivastigmine , activities of daily living , transdermal patch , transdermal , dosing , medicine , psychology , exploratory analysis , donepezil , pharmacology , physical therapy , dementia , disease , data science , computer science
Background: OPTIMA, a 48-week randomized, double-blind (DB) study, compared the efficacy and safety of 13.3 and 9.5 mg/24 h rivastigmine patches in patients with AD meeting functional and cognitive decline criteria during an initial open-label (IOL) phasewith 9.5 mg/24 h patch. The current analysis investigated the efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h patch on the autonomy in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in patients by disease severity and time-to-meet decline criteria.Methods: Patients receiving rivastigmine patch 9.5 mg/24 h, were assessed at Weeks 24, 36 and 48 of the IOL phase for functional (investigators’ judgement) and cognitive decline ( 2-point decrease in Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score from previous visit OR 3-point decrease from baseline). Decliners entered the randomized DB phase (9.5 or 13.3 mg/24 h). Co-primary outcomes included change from DB-baseline at Week 48 on the AD Cooperative Study (ADCS)-IADL scale. Prospective subgroup analyses were efficacy on ADCS-IADL by: disease severity at DB-baseline (moderate [MMSE 10 18] versus moderate-to-severe [MMSE 3 18]); and time-to-meet decline criteria ( 36 versus >36 weeks). Results: The mean DB-baseline ADCS-IADL score was higher with 13.3 mg/24 h, compared with 9.5 mg/ 24 h patch, for patients with moderate (26.7 and 24.5, respectively) or moderate-to-severe disease (25.3 and 22.8, respectively). At all time points, regardless of disease severity, slower decline in ADCS-IADL score was observed with 13.3 versus 9.5 mg/24 h patch. The mean DB-baseline ADCS-IADL score was higher with 13.3 mg/24 h, compared with 9.5 mg/ 24 h patch, for patients meeting decline criteria 36 weeks (27.1 and 24.5, respectively), but comparable for patients meeting decline criteria >36 weeks. Regardless of time-to-meet decline criteria, decline in ADCS-IADL score was less with 13.3 mg/24 h patch during Weeks 16 to 48.The superiority of the 13.3 mg/24 h patch compared with the 9.5 mg/ 24 h patch was confirmed by statistical comparisons adjusted for the corresponding baseline value for the different subgroup analyses. Conclusions: High-dose (13.3 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch demonstrates superior efficacy on functional outcomes and provides additional benefits to patients with AD, compared with 9.5 mg/24 h patch, regardless of their disease severity or time-to-meet decline criteria.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom