Premium
The use of pain relief during labor among migrant obstetric populations
Author(s) -
Husarova Viera,
Macdarby Laura,
Dicker Patrick,
Malone Fergal D.,
McCaul Conan L.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.05.003
Subject(s) - medicine , odds , odds ratio , population , obstetrics , western europe , pregnancy , demography , logistic regression , environmental health , european union , genetics , pathology , sociology , biology , business , economic policy
Objective To identify patterns in intrapartum analgesia use in the migrant obstetric population. Methods A retrospective analysis included all deliveries with neonates above 500 g in weight at a university hospital in Dublin, Ireland between 2009 and 2013. Analgesia was classified as neuraxial or non‐neuraxial. Parturients were excluded owing to missing data, elective cesarean deliveries, and the use of analgesia during treatment for obstetric complications. Results There were 36 689 deliveries included in the present study. Increased odds of not using neuraxial analgesia during delivery were observed among migrant parturients from North Africa, Sub‐Saharan Africa, the Far East, India, and Eastern Europe compared with western Europe (all P < 0.05). Increased odds of not receiving any analgesia during delivery were demonstrated among parturients from North Africa, Sub‐Saharan Africa, the Far East, North America, Eastern Europe, and India compared with western Europe (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Disparities exist in the use of intrapartum analgesia between migrant and western European populations in Ireland. Migrants from Africa were the least likely to use any analgesia. The reasons for this are speculative but could be influenced by expectations of care in the region of origin.