Premium
Intravaginal practices among HIV‐negative female sex workers along the US–Mexico border and their implications for emerging HIV prevention interventions
Author(s) -
Seidman Dominika,
Rusch Melanie,
Abramovitz Daniela,
Stockman Jamila K.,
Martinez Gustavo,
Rangel Gudelia,
Vera Alicia,
Ulibarri Monica D.,
Strathdee Steffanie A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.025
Subject(s) - medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , psychological intervention , developing country , environmental health , family medicine , economic growth , nursing , economics
Objective To describe intravaginal practices (IVPs) among female sex workers (FSWs) who inject drugs in two cities—Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez—on the border between the USA and Mexico. Methods Data for a secondary analysis were obtained from interviews conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial in FSWs who injected drugs between October 28, 2008, and May 31, 2010. Eligible individuals were aged at least 18 years and reported sharing injection equipment and having unprotected sex with clients in the previous month. Descriptive statistics were used to assess frequency and type of IVPs. Logistic regression was used to assess correlates of IVPs. Results Among 529 FSWs who completed both surveys, 229 (43.3%) had performed IVPs in the previous 6 months. Factors independently associated with IVPs were reporting any sexually transmitted infection in the previous 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–3.1; P = 0.03), three or more pregnancies (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2; P = 0.02), and having clients who became violent when proposing condom use (aOR 5.8, 95% CI 1.0–34.3; P = 0.05), which are all factors related to inconsistent condom use. Conclusion Screening for IVPs could help to identify FSW at increased risk of HIV, and facilitate conversations about specific risk‐reduction methods.