z-logo
Premium
Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version
Author(s) -
Policiano Catarina,
Costa Ana,
ValentimLourenço Alexandre,
Clode Nuno,
Graça Luís M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.03.029
Subject(s) - medicine , cesarean delivery , external cephalic version , vaginal delivery , cephalic presentation , obstetrics , pregnancy , gynecology , breech presentation , genetics , biology
Objective To evaluate the delivery route and the indications for cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version (ECV). Methods A retrospective matched case–control study was conducted at a hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, between 2002 and 2012. Each woman who underwent successful ECV (n = 44) was compared with the previous and next women who presented for labor management and who had the same parity and a singleton vertex pregnancy at term (n = 88). The outcome measures were route of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and incidence of nonreassuring fetal status. Results Attempts at ECV were successful in 62 (46%) of 134 women, and 44 women whose fetuses remained in a cephalic presentation until delivery were included in the study. The rates of intrapartum cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery did not differ significantly between cases and controls (intrapartum cesarean delivery, 9 [20%] vs 16 [18%], P = 0.75; operative vaginal delivery, 14 [32%] vs 19 [22%], P = 0.20). The indications for cesarean delivery after successful ECV did not differ; in both groups, cesarean delivery was mainly performed for labor arrest disorders (cases, 6 [67%] vs controls, 13 [81%]; P = 0.63). Conclusion Successful ECV was not associated with increased rates of intrapartum cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here