Premium
Obstetric interventions for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Cundy Tim,
Morgan Joanna,
O'Beirne Claire,
Gamble Greg,
Budden Astrid,
Ivanova Valeria,
Wallace Mairi
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.022
Subject(s) - medicine , type 2 diabetes , glycemic , obesity , diabetes mellitus , type 1 diabetes , pregnancy , obstetrics , population , secular variation , psychological intervention , pediatrics , demography , endocrinology , environmental health , psychiatry , sociology , biology , genetics
Abstract Objective To determine whether differences exist in the rates of obstetric intervention between women with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes, and whether there has been any change in cesarean rates over time, paralleling that seen in the general obstetric population. Methods Data were examined from a prospectively collected series on the outcomes of 1030 deliveries (382 by women with type 1 diabetes, 648 by women with type 2 diabetes) from 1988 to 2008. Results There was a secular trend to increasing maternal age (type 1, P < 0.003; type 2, P < 0.03). Intervention rates (induction of labor or elective cesarean) did not differ between type 1 (88%) and type 2 (85%) diabetes. The overall cesarean rate was 52%–55% with no secular trend. Poorer glycemic control in early pregnancy and primiparity were associated with primary cesarean in both groups. In women with type 1 diabetes, greater maternal obesity and retinopathy were also associated with primary cesarean. Conclusion Intervention rates are high in pregnancies among women with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes but they have not changed significantly. Secular trends toward increasing maternal age and obesity suggest that intervention rates are unlikely to decrease in the near future.