Premium
Vaginal cuff dehiscence after hysterectomy
Author(s) -
Koo YuJin,
Kim DaeYeon,
Kim JongHyeok,
Kim YongMan,
Kim YoungTak,
Nam JooHyun
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.004
Subject(s) - medicine , hysterectomy , incidence (geometry) , odds ratio , confidence interval , abdominal hysterectomy , surgery , retrospective cohort study , dehiscence , obstetrics , physics , optics
Abstract Objective To determine the incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) among women undergoing hysterectomy according to clinico‐surgical factors including surgical route, and to describe patient characteristics associated with VCD. Methods In a retrospective study, the medical records of all women who underwent hysterectomy between January 2005 and March 2011 at a university teaching hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea, were reviewed. The incidence of VCD was determined in relation to the following factors: patient age, hysterectomy route, indication for hysterectomy, and extent of resection (either simple or radical hysterectomy). Results Among 9973 hysterectomies, 37 (0.37%) cases of VCD were identified. The incidence of VCD was significantly higher after abdominal hysterectomy (0.6%) than after laparoscopic (0.2%) or vaginal (0.4%) hysterectomy ( P = 0.016). Compared with laparoscopic approaches, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk of VCD (odds ratio, 2.735; 95% confidence interval, 1.380–5.420). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of VCD according to surgical indication or extent of resection. Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy was found to be associated with a lower risk of VCD compared with abdominal hysterectomy. The lower risk is probably related to the different techniques used for colpotomy and cuff closure.