Premium
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
Author(s) -
Chalermchockchareonkit Amphan,
Tekasakul Putthawan,
Chaisilwattana Pongsakdi,
Sirimai Korakot,
Wahab Noraziana
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022
Subject(s) - medicine , endometriosis , hysterectomy , abdominal hysterectomy , blood loss , retrospective cohort study , blood transfusion , surgery , complication , laparoscopy , gynecology
Objective To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes—including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion—were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [ P < 0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [ P < 0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [ P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusion Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy.