z-logo
Premium
The effect of “breathable” panty liners on the female lower genital tract
Author(s) -
Giraldo Paulo C.,
Amaral Rose L.G.,
Juliato Cássia,
Eleutério José,
Brolazo Eliane,
Gonçalves Ana K.S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.016
Subject(s) - bacterial vaginosis , medicine , vaginal flora , vaginal discharge , irritation , vaginitis , vulvovaginal candidiasis , vagina , gynecology , vaginal smear , vaginal disease , randomized controlled trial , dermatology , surgery , immunology , estrous cycle , antifungal
Objective To evaluate whether the use of “breathable” panty liners (BPLs) alters the normal vaginal flora, increases the incidence of bacterial vaginosis and/or vaginal candidiasis, or causes vulvar irritation. Methods A randomized controlled trial assessed the vaginal ecosystem of women without complaints of vaginal discharge. The study group (n = 53) wore BPLs for 10–12 hours each day for 75 consecutive days, whereas the control group (n = 54) wore only their usual underwear. At each of 6 visits during 3 menstrual cycles, participants underwent gynecologic examination with colposcopic evaluation and pH measurement, in addition to assessment of vaginal microbial flora, intensity of inflammatory processes, and presence of vaginal candidiasis/bacterial vaginosis in Gram‐stained smears. Results After 75 consecutive days of BPL use, 40/44 (90.9%) and 42/44 (95.5%) women reported no complaints of vaginal discharge or vulvar itching/burning, respectively. There was no significant difference between the study group and the control group with regard to positive vaginal fungus cultures (5/44 [11.4%] vs 8/50 [16.0%]; P = 0.7848) or bacterial vaginosis (3/44 [6.8%] vs 2/50 [4.0%]; P = 0.7974) at the end of the study period. Conclusion After 75 days of BPL use, there was no significant increase in vulvovaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal irritation, or vulvovaginal inflammation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here