Premium
Intrauterine insemination in Jamaica as a low‐cost subfertility treatment in a low‐resource region
Author(s) -
Christie Loxley R.,
Harriott John A.,
Dacosta Ver E.,
Wynter Shaun H.,
Everett Denise M.,
Foster Rochelle A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.017
Subject(s) - medicine , intrauterine insemination , infertility , live birth , gynecology , pregnancy , insemination , obstetrics , pregnancy rate , in vitro fertilisation , assisted reproductive technology , fertility , artificial insemination , unexplained infertility , retrospective cohort study , sperm , population , andrology , surgery , biology , environmental health , genetics
Objective To determine the impact of intrauterine insemination on the management of subfertility in Jamaica. Methods The present study was a retrospective analysis of all intrauterine insemination cycles completed from May 1, 2002, to August 31, 2005, at the University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica. The cycle pregnancy rate (CPR), live‐birth rate (LBR), and cumulative pregnancy rate were obtained and prognostic factors were reviewed. Results The CPR, LBR, and cumulative pregnancy rate were 10.1%, 8.8%, and 13.9%, respectively. Improved success was significantly associated with a shorter period of infertility (3.10 ± 1.43 years vs 5.22 ± 2.89 years; P = 0.01). Women younger than 40 years of age, men with increased post‐preparation sperm counts, and couples undergoing 2–3 cycles had improved outcomes. Conclusion Intrauterine insemination represents a safe and cost‐effective option for mild male factor infertility or unexplained infertility, especially in resource‐poor regions such as the Caribbean. Repeated failed cycles identify those who would probably benefit from early intervention with in vitro fertilization.