Premium
Rapid intrapartum or postpartum HIV testing at a midwife obstetric unit and a district hospital in South Africa
Author(s) -
Theron Gerhard B.,
Shapiro David E.,
Van Dyke Russell,
Cababasay Mae P.,
Louw Jeanne,
Watts D. Heather,
Smith Elizabeth,
Bulterys Marc,
Maupin Robert
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.011
Subject(s) - medicine , nevirapine , obstetrics , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , voluntary counseling and testing , pregnancy , randomized controlled trial , population , antiretroviral therapy , family medicine , health facility , health services , surgery , viral load , environmental health , biology , genetics
Objective To compare the prepartum and postpartum feasibility and acceptance of voluntary counseling and rapid testing (VCT) among women with unknown HIV status in South Africa. Methods Eligible women were randomized according to the calendar week of presentation to receive VCT either while in labor or after delivery. Results Of 7238 women approached, 542 (7.5%) were eligible, 343 (63%) were enrolled, and 45 (13%) were found to be HIV infected. The proportions of eligible women who accepted VCT were 66.8% (161 of 241) in the intrapartum arm and 60.5% (182 of 301) in the postpartum arm, and the difference of 6.3% (95% CI, − 1.8% to 14.5%) was not significant. The median times (44 and 45 minutes) required to conduct VCT were also similar in the 2 arms. In the intrapartum arm, all women in true labor received their test results before delivery and all those found to be HIV positive accepted prophylaxis with nevirapine before delivery. Conclusions Rapid testing in labor wards for women with an unknown HIV status is feasible and well accepted, and allows for a more timely antiretroviral prophylaxis than postpartum testing.