Premium
Evaluation of laparoscopic management of gynecologic emergencies by residents
Author(s) -
Minig Lucas,
Velazco Andrea,
Lamm Marina,
Velez Jorge Iván,
Venturini Nadia Caroppo,
Testa Roberto
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.006
Subject(s) - medicine , laparotomy , pelvic inflammatory disease , laparoscopy , retrospective cohort study , general surgery , surgery
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic management of women with gynecologic emergencies by the residents and the chief resident in an organized resident training program. Methods A retrospective study of patients with gynecologic emergencies who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 1, 1999, and May 31, 2006 was done. Results For the 369 patients included, the mean operative time of 74 ± 31.35 minutes was significantly increased by advanced patient age ( P < 0.001), pelvic inflammatory disease with or without tubo‐ovarian abscess (PID ± TOA) ( P < 0.050), the first semester of chief residency ( P < 0.050), and conversion to laparotomy ( P < 0.001). Mean length of hospital stay was 40 ± 24 hours. Factors such as advanced patient age ( P < 0.001), prolonged length of surgery ( P < 0.001), PID ± TOA ( P < 0.001), first semester of chief residency ( P < 0.050), conversion to laparotomy ( P < 0.001), and blood transfusion ( P < 0.050) significantly increased the length of hospital stay. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 4.6% (n = 17), and it was significantly associated with advanced women age (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05–1.17, P < 0.001) and PID ± TOA (OR 6.04; 95%CI, 2.17–16.62, P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were recorded in 3 (0.81%) patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic management of gynecologic emergencies by senior residents and a chief resident within an organized resident training program is feasible. These results reinforce the relevance of a well‐structured residency endoscopic training program.