Premium
Three‐step versus “see‐and‐treat” approach in women with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in a low‐resource country
Author(s) -
Li Zhi Gang,
Qian De Ying,
Cen Jian Min,
Chen Guan Di,
Shu Yan Hong
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.011
Subject(s) - medicine , colposcopy , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , biopsy , squamous intraepithelial lesion , loop electrosurgical excision procedure , gynecology , obstetrics , cervical cancer , radiology , cancer
Objective To investigate the frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or greater in women with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and to evaluate whether colposcopically‐directed biopsy is a necessary procedure for managing HSIL in a low‐resource country. Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of women with HSIL on a Pap smear. Results Of 348 women who had undergone colposcopically‐directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP), 321 (92.2%) had CIN 2 or greater. Of these, 279 were diagnosed with CIN 2 or greater on biopsy as were 264 on LEEP. The lesions in women who had CIN 2, satisfactory colposcopy, and more biopsies were more likely to be completely excised by biopsy. The mean length of time between the initial Pap smear and LEEP was significantly longer than between the initial Pap smear and biopsy. Conclusion Women with HSIL can be effectively managed using the see‐and‐treat approach in a low‐resource country owing to the frequency of CIN 2 or greater.