Open AccessFeasibility and safety of conventional laparoscopic instruments in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: Experience with one hundred cases
Author(s) -
Yao Chou Tsai
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
formosan journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2213-5413
pISSN - 1682-606X
DOI - 10.1016/j.fjs.2011.10.002
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , blood loss , nephrectomy , laparoscopy , laparoscopic surgery , complication , body mass index , general surgery , kidney , pathology , endocrinology
SummaryBackground and purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of conventional laparoscopic instruments in common urological laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) procedures.MethodsFrom 2008 to 2010, we retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from 100 patients who underwent LESS procedures by a single surgeon for various common urological indications. The LESS operations included adrenalectomy (n=15), radical nephrectomy (n=3), radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection (n=5), varicocelectomy (n=12), nephropexy (n=4), lumbar sympathectomy (n=4), and adult hernia mesh repair (n=57).ResultsAll procedures were completed successfully without ancillary ports or articulating instruments, except in two cases that required laparoscopic conversion. The mean patient age was 48.9 years, and the mean body mass index was 23.8. The mean operative time was 99.7 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 17.3mL, and the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. No intra-operative complication occurred.ConclusionOur experience revealed that the usage of conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe in common urological LESS procedures