z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Have all the ICD primary prevention trials excluded an important group of patients?
Author(s) -
Islam Bolad,
David P. Martin
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
ep europace
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1532-2092
pISSN - 1099-5129
DOI - 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.121
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , revascularization , perioperative , intensive care medicine , population , cardiology , clinical trial , ventricular tachycardia , primary prevention , randomized controlled trial , myocardial infarction , surgery , disease , environmental health
Primary prevention trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy have generally excluded patients early after revascularization. Clinicians are commonly faced with patients who have ventricular dysfunction and nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia developing shortly after revascularization. Since there are no evidence-based guidelines, management is currently at the discretion of the treating clinician. Recently, evidence has emerged that this patient population is at increased risk of development of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia and, pending prospective trials, we suggest that ICD therapy should be used in appropriately selected patients with perioperative ventricular arrhythmia.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom