
Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in correlation with diffusion weighted (DWI) MR for characterization of ovarian masses
Author(s) -
Eman S. Nasr,
Ikram Hamed,
I. H. Abbas,
Nagat Mansour Khalifa
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine /the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.19
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 2090-4762
pISSN - 0378-603X
DOI - 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.04.002
Subject(s) - medicine , diffusion mri , radiology , ovarian tumor , magnetic resonance imaging , effective diffusion coefficient , nuclear medicine , ovarian cancer , cancer
Ovarian tumors; are the second most common gynecological tumor and are the fifth commonest tumor in women. It is desirable to preoperatively differentiate benign from malignant tumor to decide whether surgery is required, and which type of surgery is appropriate avoiding unnecessary surgery, adding dynamic contrast and diffusion weighted to conventional images can help in differentiation of benign ovarian tumor from malignant. DWI depends on the fact that water molecules can diffuse freely in low cellular environment, while tissue hyper cellularity causes its restriction. As a result, malignant ovarian tumors due to its hypercellular nature show restriction of diffusion, unlike most benign tumors. This study aims at reviewing and emphasizing the role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MR in characterization of ovarian lesions.Patients and methodsThis study was performed on 30 patients referred to the radiology department from surgical department by ovarian masses. Pelvic MR with DWI was done for all patients, DCE-MR was done for 29 out of 30 patients. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery with pathologic correlation. Five patients were put under regular follow up US for 3months.ResultsThe sensitivity of MRI was 99.9% while that of DWI was 100%. The specificity was higher for DWI (75%) compared to conventional MRI (58.3%), as well as the accuracy which was 73.9% for MRI while that of DWI was 86.9%. The mean ADC values for malignant lesions were (0.84×10−3±0.1SDmm2/s), while that for benign lesions were (1.8×10−3±0.5SDmm2/s), with cut off 1.2×10−3 and p value=0.005. Mature teratomas showed restricted diffusion with ADC values 0.8×10−3mm2/s (false positive), due to mixed cellularity of the teratoma. Hemorrhagic cysts and endometriomas showed high signal not only on diffusion images but also on corresponding ADC map and ADC values 1.3–1.4×10−3 (T2 Shine-through). Sensitivity of MRI was 99.9% while that of DCE-MRI was 60%. The specificity was higher for DCE 91% compared to conventional MRI sequences 58.3%, as well as the accuracy which was 73.9% for MRI while that of DCE was 77% and so addition of DCE to the MRI is expected to increase the specificity and the accuracy of examination.ConclusionCombination of DWI and DCE to conventional MRI improves the specificity of MRI and thus increasing radiologist’s confidence in image interpretation which will finally reflect on patients’ outcome and prognosis