z-logo
Premium
Self‐assessed symptoms in chronic heart failure — Important information for clinical management
Author(s) -
Ekman Inger,
Kjörk Ewa,
Andersson Bert
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.10.020
Subject(s) - medicine , heart failure , ejection fraction , cardiology
Aim: To compare the patients' self‐assessment of the severity of their symptoms with a physicians assessment and to evaluate the ability of self‐assessed symptoms and ejection fraction (EF) to predict long‐term survival in heart failure patients. Method: Patients ( n =332) evaluated symptoms using a self‐administered functional classification scale (Specific Activity Scale, SAS), which is equivalent to the NYHA scale. EF and NYHA functional class was also recorded. All patients were followed over a 3‐year period. Results: Approximately 50% of patients classified themselves into SAS class I. In contrast, the cardiologists classified only 9% of the patients as NYHA class I. In patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF≤0.35) SAS score (HR 1.48, 95% CI [1.03−2.12] p =0.03) and ACE inhibitor treatment (0.23 [0.11−.51], p =0.0003) independently predicted 3‐year mortality in a multivariable analysis. EF was not predictive of mortality in the low EF group. Only age predicted long‐term outcome in patients with preserved systolic function. Conclusion: Patients' self‐assessed symptoms and NYHA classification are not coherent. Left ventricular EF is of less importance in comparison with symptoms in chronic heart failure. Patients reporting less severe symptoms had a favourable 3‐year prognosis, regardless of EF.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom