z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Echocardiography versus right heart catheterization in class I pulmonary hypertension
Author(s) -
Reem I. El-Korashy,
Y.M. Amin,
Ahmed Ibrahim Eissa,
Teaf Thabet
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
egyptian journal of chest diseases and tuberculosis/egyptian journal of chest diseases and tuberculosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2090-9950
pISSN - 0422-7638
DOI - 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.12.005
Subject(s) - medicine , right heart catheterization , pulmonary hypertension , cardiology , right heart , cardiac catheterization
It has been agreed that pulmonary hypertension should be determined by right heart catheterization. However, being invasive and refused by many patients, echocardiography was thought to be a reasonable substitute to determine a solid diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. So fourteen patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (class I) were studied by estimating pulmonary artery systolic pressure by both transthoracic echocardiography and right heart catheterization using Swan-Ganz catheter. The patients were 4 males and 10 females with mean ages about 46.25±23.33 in males and 36.8±11.63 in females (total mean age was about 39.5±15.46 years). Mean value of the Echo SPAP: 82.79+34.25mmHg, however in the RHC SPAP 76.21+24.97.Comparing both clinical procedures via the Altman and Bland statistical method showed discrepancy between both procedures. Results showed that the 6MWD (mean+SD 262.64±85.98) is significantly correlated with the mean pulmonary arterial pressure only.Conclusion: Echocardiography cannot be reliable alone in the proper decision making of diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here