z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
“... El magonismo no existe”: Ricardo Flores Magón
Author(s) -
Marco Antonio Samaniego López
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
estudios de historia moderna y contemporánea de méxico
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.117
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2448-5004
pISSN - 0185-2620
DOI - 10.1016/j.ehmcm.2014.12.001
Subject(s) - ideology , historiography , term (time) , political science , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , law , humanities , politics , physics , quantum mechanics
ResumenEl artículo demuestra que los anarquistas del Partido Liberal Mexicano no se identificaban ni querían ser llamados “magonistas”, por ser una forma de denominarlos que era contraria a su ideología. Ricardo Flores Magón manifestó claramente que el uso de dicho término era para confundir al pueblo mexicano y compararlos con otros ismos a los que denostaban. No querían personalismos, ni autoridades, ni jefes, debido a que los intereses personales se sobreponen siempre a los colectivos. De igual forma, el uso de “magonismo” surge por parte de las autoridades federales en su afán persecutorio. Posteriormente, la historiografía, en dos grandes líneas, ha utilizado dicho término para explicar la participación de los miembros del PLM; sin embargo, es una forma que contradice la ideología de quienes pretenden describir.AbstractThe article proves that the anarchists of the Mexican Liberal party neither were identifying, or did not even want to be called “magonistas”, for being a way of calling them that it was opposite to their ideology. Ricardo Flores Magón stated clearly that the use of the above mentioned term was to confuse the Mexican people and to compare them with other isms that denigrated them. They did not wanted personalizing, neither authorities, nor chiefs, due to the fact that the personal interests superimpose to collective ones. Similarly, the use of “magonismo” arises from federal authorities in their persecutory zeal. Later, Historiography, in two big lines, has used the term to explain the participation of members of the PLM, nevertheless, it is a form that contradicts the ideology of those who purport to describe

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here