data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
Mechanisms of atrial flutter following epicardial high intensity focused ultrasound left atrial ablative procedures during concomitant cardiac surgery
Author(s) -
Ahmed ElDamaty,
Magdy Basta,
John L. Sapp
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the egyptian heart journal /the egyptian heart journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.212
H-Index - 9
eISSN - 2090-911X
pISSN - 1110-2608
DOI - 10.1016/j.ehj.2014.04.003
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial flutter , ablation , cardiology , pulmonary vein , atrial fibrillation , catheter ablation , reentry
Iatrogenic atrial tachyarrhythmias have increased with the widespread application of left atrial ablative procedures to treat atrial fibrillation.Methods and resultsEntrainment and activation mapping were utilized to study the mechanisms of atrial flutter in two patients who presented with atypical atrial flutter after high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) atrial ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation during the course of concomitant cardiac surgery. Case 1: Atrial flutter with CL of 340ms was demonstrated to be mediated by entry into and exit from the partially isolated posterior left atrium (LA) with conduction delay across at least one of the connections. The exit site was near the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and the entrance site was near the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) as demonstrated by activation and entrainment mapping. Case 2: Entrainment mapping was highly suggestive of inferior exit from the HIFU ablation line between the two inferior pulmonary veins. Flutter terminated during trans-septal procedure and could not be re-induced. Activation mapping of the LA during pacing revealed the inferior exit and left superior entrance site, both of which were successfully ablated, isolating the posterior LA.ConclusionsRe-entrant atrial flutter post-HIFU epicor Maze is caused by slow conduction at entry and exit sites from the otherwise isolated posterior LA wall. In both cases, gaps were found close to the LSPV and RIPV which may reflect difficulty in achieving proper contact between the HIFU device and the left atrial wall at these sites. These gaps are amenable to catheter ablation