z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Role of delayed contrast enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 Tesla in patients with chronic heart failure
Author(s) -
Azza Farrag,
Mohamad Salem,
Seif El Deen Abaza,
Magdy Bassiouny,
Mohamad Homos
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the egyptian heart journal /the egyptian heart journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.212
H-Index - 9
eISSN - 2090-911X
pISSN - 1110-2608
DOI - 10.1016/j.ehj.2012.06.006
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ejection fraction , coronary artery disease , heart failure , dyslipidemia , stenosis , artery , diabetes mellitus , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , disease , endocrinology
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with delayed contrast enhancement (DCE) has been recently emerged as an easy-to-perform method for differentiation between normal and diseased myocardium. The aim of this study was to delineate the etiology of chronic heart failure (CHF) non-invasively using DCE-CMR at 3.0 Tesla.MethodsThirty-four patients with CHF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, and no clear history or objective evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) were evaluated by contrast-enhanced CMR (Philips Achiva 3.0 T) and conventional coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as >50% diameter stenosis of major epicardial coronary vessel.ResultsFifteen patients showed subendocardial and/or transmural pattern of DCE (group A). Nineteen patients showed pattern of mid wall and/or subepicardial or no DCE (group B). Group A patients were older (52±9 vs. 45±10years, p=0.042), had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia, p=0.001. LVEF was comparable in both groups. Coronary angiography showed significant CAD in 14/15 patients in group A. The other patient had coronary artery ectasia of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Normal angiogram was seen in 18/19 patients in group B. The other patient had 60% diameter stenosis of mid dominant right coronary artery. The sensitivity and specificity of DCE-CMR for detection of CAD were 93.3% and 94.7% respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 17.74.ConclusionPattern of DCE-CMR at 3.0 Tesla may help delineation of etiology of CHF and makes clear distinction between ischemic and non-ischemic pathomorphology

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here