English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Ensuring reliable administration and reporting of cognitive screening tests are fundamental in establishing good clinical practice and research. This study captured the rate and type of errors in clinical practice, using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination‐III (ACE‐III), and then the reduction in error rate using a computerized alternative, the ACEmobile app.    Methods  In study 1, we evaluated ACE‐III assessments completed in National Health Service (NHS) clinics ( n  = 87) for administrator error. In study 2, ACEmobile and ACE‐III were then evaluated for their ability to capture accurate measurement.    Results  In study 1, 78% of clinically administered ACE‐IIIs were either scored incorrectly or had arithmetical errors. In study 2, error rates seen in the ACE‐III were reduced by 85%–93% using ACEmobile.    Discussion  Error rates are ubiquitous in routine clinical use of cognitive screening tests and the ACE‐III. ACEmobile provides a framework for supporting reduced administration, scoring, and arithmetical error during cognitive screening.

Improving the quality of cognitive screening assessments: ACEmobile, an iPad‐based version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination‐III