Open AccessFunction and clinical meaningfulness of treatments for mild Alzheimer's disease
Author(s) -
Siemers Eric,
Holdridge Karen Chilcott,
Sundell Karen L.,
LiuSeifert Hong
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia: diagnosis, assessment and disease monitoring
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.497
H-Index - 37
ISSN - 2352-8729
DOI - 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.02.006
Subject(s) - cognition , disease , alzheimer's disease , medicine , psychology , psychiatry
Effectiveness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments is commonly evaluated with coprimary outcomes; cognition with function to ensure clinical meaningfulness of a cognitive effect. Methods We reviewed the literature for functional outcomes in mild AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients (distinct from combined mild‐moderate/severe AD) treated with approved AD drugs. Cognitive and functional treatment differences in mild AD patients in solanezumab EXPEDITION/EXPEDITION2 studies were compared across time. Results Seven publications provided MCI/mild AD functional outcomes, one of which reported a significant functional treatment effect. Secondary analyses of EXPEDITION studies suggested a smaller functional effect of solanezumab relative to cognition. An increasing effect of solanezumab over 18 months was shown for cognition and function. Discussion Function as the sole measure to demonstrate clinical meaningfulness of cognitive effects in mild AD may have limitations. For disease‐modifying treatments, point differences on cognitive and functional scales should be qualified with duration of treatment.