z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
COVID-19: Is there a weaker sex?
Author(s) -
Sergio Alejandro GómezOchoa,
Nina Van Poll,
Oscar H. Franco
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
case reports in women s health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.259
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 2214-9112
DOI - 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00263
Subject(s) - covid-19 , virology , medicine , outbreak , infectious disease (medical specialty) , disease
Sex is one of the most relevant factors often associated with health, disease severity, mortality, and life expectancy [1]. From neonatal diseases to non-communicable disorders, men often have higher risks and poorer prognosis; however, the causes of these disparities are still subject to debate [2–7]. In this context, the new coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has again called attention to these differences, mainly due to the observations of a higher level of complications and fatality rates among men [8]. According to data from the Global Health 50/50 initiative, which collects sex-disaggregated information from COVID19 cases worldwide, from the 75 countries reporting case and death data by sex, 63 revealed a male:female ratio of mortality over 1, three countries having a value of 1 and only nine a ratio below this mark (Fig. 1). Furthermore, a recent study observed that although the male: female ratio of deaths per 100,000 individuals varied by age, the probability of death remained higher in males across all age categories [9]. In addition, a recently published study from India revealed that themagnitude of the differential risk by sex was higher as age increased, suggesting a role of age in this association [10]. Beyond these population observations, several studies have concluded that male sex is a risk factor for COVID-19 adverse outcomes, even in multivariate analyses after adjusting for potential confounders [11–14]. The association between male gender and adverse outcomes, such asmortality, seems consistent across all geographical areas, as revealed by several meta-analyses [15–18]. The reasons for this trend are likely to be multifactorial, including physiological factors, lifestyle, and socio-cultural behaviors [19] (Fig. 2). The physiological differences between the sexes may initially be directly involved in this differential risk of COVID-19 adverse outcomes [20]. For example, recent evidence has suggested that SARSCoV-2 expression may induce angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) downregulation due to the binding of the viral spike protein to its receptor, then promoting a decrease in the angiotensin[1–7] production [21]. In this context, there is evidence suggesting an important role of sex hormones in the regulation of ACE-2 in a tissue-specific manner [20]. For example, female mice were observed to have a higher expression of ACE-2 in adipose tissue compared with male mice, leading to higher levels of Ang[1–7], which in turn were associated with lower levels of hypertension, another risk factor for COVID-19 negative outcomes [22,23]. Similarly, higher testosterone levels in males may be related to a higher risk of coagulation disorders, resulting in complications such as venous thromboembolism and systemic embolisms, which are frequently observed in severe COVID-19 patients [24,25]. Furthermore, differences in the immune responses against SARSCoV-2 between sexes may also play an important role. Takahashi et al.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom