z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationship analysis of Jatropha curcas L. inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences
Author(s) -
GuoYe Guo,
Fang Chen,
Xiaodong Shi,
Yinshuai Tian,
Maoqun Yu,
Han Xueqin,
Yuan LiChun,
Ying Zhang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
comptes rendus biologies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1768-3238
pISSN - 1631-0691
DOI - 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.06.004
Subject(s) - phylogenetic tree , biology , jatropha curcas , genetic diversity , internal transcribed spacer , genetic variation , ribosomal dna , evolutionary biology , genetic divergence , intraspecific competition , phylogenetics , maximum parsimony , genetic distance , botany , genetics , clade , zoology , gene , population , demography , sociology
Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships among 102 Jatropha curcas accessions from Asia, Africa, and the Americas were assessed using the internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA ITS). The average G+C content (65.04%) was considerably higher than the A+T (34.96%) content. The estimated genetic diversity revealed moderate genetic variation. The pairwise genetic divergences (GD) between haplotypes were evaluated and ranged from 0.000 to 0.017, suggesting a higher level of genetic differentiation in Mexican accessions than those of other regions. Phylogenetic relationships and intraspecific divergence were inferred by Bayesian inference (BI), maximum parsimony (MP), and median joining (MJ) network analysis and were generally resolved. The J. curcas accessions were consistently divided into three lineages, groups A, B, and C, which demonstrated distant geographical isolation and genetic divergence between American accessions and those from other regions. The MJ network analysis confirmed that Central America was the possible center of origin. The putative migration route suggested that J. curcas was distributed from Mexico or Brazil, via Cape Verde and then split into two routes. One route was dispersed to Spain, then migrated to China, eventually spreading to southeastern Asia, while the other route was dispersed to Africa, via Madagascar and migrated to China, later spreading to southeastern Asia.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom