z-logo
Premium
Ongoing regional prevalence study of fetal alcohol exposure as determined by Meconium analysis of fatty acid ethyl esters
Author(s) -
Gareri J.,
Koren G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.250
Subject(s) - meconium , chemistry , population , alcohol , fetus , biomarker , obstetrics , medicine , chromatography , pregnancy , biochemistry , environmental health , biology , genetics
Background/Aims Fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) in meconium have been established as a novel biomarker for fetal alcohol exposure. This study is the first application of the FAEE test as a neonatal screening tool. A positive cut‐off value was established by our laboratory in a baseline study of 183 non‐drinking women. We aim to apply this positive cut‐off value to the meconium FAEE levels of a regional neonatal population in southwestern Ontario in order to establish a fetal alcohol exposure prevalence value for the area. Methods This is an anonymous prevalence study. One meconium sample is collected from each subject. Samples are obtained from five regional birthing hospitals (one tertiary care). FAEE content is determined by gas chromatography following liquid‐liquid and solid‐phase extraction. Palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, and arachidonic acid ethyl esters are measured. Results 498 samples were collected between January 1 st and September 1 st , 2004. The coverage rate for this segment of the study is 78.80%. 102 samples have been analyzed: 4 samples have measured above the positive cut‐off of 2.0 nmol total FAEE/g meconium. Conclusions The preliminary results of this study demonstrate a fetal alcohol exposure rate of 3.92%. This value represents a 13‐fold increase over the rate of heavy drinking in pregnancy (≥14 drinks/ week) established by the CDC through anonymous surveys in both 1997 and 2002. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77 , P93–P93; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.250

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here