z-logo
Premium
Validation of a new outpatient orthopedic pain model utilizing “Hammertoe” surgery: Statistical separation of an opioid combination and a Cox ‐2 inhibitor from placebo
Author(s) -
Desjardins P. J.,
Cantu N.,
Black P. M.,
Daniels S. E.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.089
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , acetaminophen , orthopedic surgery , hydrocodone , anesthesia , analgesic , clinical pharmacology , dosing , clinical trial , opioid , surgery , pharmacology , oxycodone , alternative medicine , receptor , pathology
Background/Aims Few outpatient orthopedic pain models exist. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a new outpatient orthopedic pain model using Hammertoe surgery. Methods The study design was a single dose, double‐blind, randomized trial assessing the effect of two marketed analgesics for acute pain after Hammertoe surgery. Subjects underwent a primary unilateral hammertoe repair requiring open partial phalangectomy with/without fixation. Upon reaching moderate or severe post‐operative pain, patients were randomized to: Celecoxib 200 mg (n=29), hydrocodone/acetaminophen 10/1000 mg (n=29) or placebo (n=13). Analgesic assessments over 8 hours included: TOTPAR, SPID & SPRID and Onset. Results Results indicated excellent assay sensitivity as the model separated both compounds from placebo: TOTPAR hours 4 & 8, p<.001 & p<.02 respectively; SPID hours 4 & 8 p<.001 & p<.01 respectively; SPRID hours 4 & 8 p<.005 & p<.009 respectively. Both agents achieved median onsets of .5 hours compared to placebo (p<.002). Data collected on post‐dosing days 2–6 demonstrated that the majority of patients took supplemental analgesics over this period. Conclusion This study demonstrated assay sensitivity and utility of the Hammertoe model for the study of analgesics in acute pain and its potential for multi‐day, multi‐dose designs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77 , P52–P52; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.089

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here