z-logo
Premium
Dextromethorphan to dextrorphan urinary metabolic ratio not sensitive enough to assess modest changes in CYP2D6 activity
Author(s) -
Gorski J. C.,
Li L.,
Hamman M. A.,
Hall S. D.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.11.314
Subject(s) - dextrorphan , dextromethorphan , crossover study , chemistry , medicine , pharmacology , placebo , alternative medicine , pathology
The ability of the dextromethorphan (DTM) to dextrorphan (DT) urinary metabolic ratio (UMR) to detect subtle changes in CYP2D6 activity is not well defined. 10 extensive metabolizers and 1 poor metabolizer were studied on two separate occasions. Serum and urine were collected over 24 hours after DTM (30 mg) oral dosing. DTM and DT were quantitated by LC‐MS (serum) and HPLC‐fluorescence (urine). The DTM oral clearance (CL PO ), DTM/DT AUC ratio, and DTM/DT UMR were determined. DTM CL PO was significantly correlated with the DTM/DT AUC ratio (r = 0.98) and DTM/DT UMR (n= 22; r = 0.765). Exclusion of the poor metabolizer resulted in loss of correlation between DTM CL PO and DTM/DT UMR (r <0.001) but not DTM/DT AUC ratio(r = 0.84). Intra and inter subject variability for DTM CL PO , DTM/DT AUC ratio, and DTM/DT UMR was estimated to be 15%, 26%, 35% and 32%, 68%, 100%, respectively. Assuming an effect size of 30%, type I error rate at 5%, 80% power and a crossover design requires a sample size of 14, 34 or 56 patients when the primary outcome measure is DTM CL PO , DTM/DT AUC ratio, DTM/DT UMR, respectively. If 14 subjects are used in a crossover study design and the DTM/DT UMR is used, the effect size would have to be 395% to maintain 80% power. Cross‐sectional studies are similarly affected when the DTM/DT UMR is the principle outcome. The limitations of the DTM/DT UMR should be taken into account when modest effect sizes are expected. Supported by NIH Grants M01RR00750 and FDT001756. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2004) 75 , P82–P82; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.11.314

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here