
Prevalence of breast cancer sub-types by immunohistochemistry in patients in the Regional General Hospital 72, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Author(s) -
Gabriel Pérez-Rodríguez
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cirugía y cirujanos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2444-0507
DOI - 10.1016/j.circen.2015.09.017
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , immunohistochemistry , pathological , mastectomy , disease , cancer , retrospective cohort study , oncology , stage (stratigraphy) , quadrant (abdomen) , incidence (geometry) , gynecology , pathology , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
BackgroundBreast cancer mortality has increased in women 25 years and over, and since 2006 it has surpassed cervical cancer. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with several clinical and histological presentations that require a thorough study of all clinical and pathological parameters, including immunohistochemistry to classify it into subtypes, have a better prognosis, provide individualised treatment, increase survival, and reduce mortality.ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of sub-types of breast cancer and the association with the clinical and histopathological features of the tumour.Material and methodsAn observational, retrospective, cross-sectional and analytical study was conducted on 1380 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer, and they have been classified by immunohistochemistry into four subtypes: luminal A, triple negative, luminal B and HER2. An analysis was performed on the association with age, risk factors, and the clinical and histopathological features of the tumour.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 53.3±11.4 years. The frequency was luminal A (65%), triple negative (14%), luminal B (12%), and HER2 (9%). The most frequent characteristics were in the 50–59 age range, late menopause, the right side, upper external quadrant, stage II, metastatic lymph nodes, and mastectomy.ConclusionThe most frequent sub-type was luminal A, and together with the luminal B they have better prognosis compared with the triple negative and HER2