Scheduled hysterectomy vs. urgent hysterectomy in patients with placenta accreta in a high specialty medical unit

BackgroundPatients with placenta accreta have a high frequency of complications and death risk.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the results of scheduled hysterectomy vs. urgent hysterectomy in patients with placenta accreta in a high specialty medical unit.Material and methodsAn observational, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing patient records with confirmed diagnostic of placenta accreta, who attended in a one year period. They were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery, scheduled or urgent. Descriptive statistics were applied, with comparisons using Student t-test and chi squared tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere were 4592 births in the period of study, and 125 obstetric hysterectomies were performed, with 40 confirmed cases of accreta (8.7 per thousand births) with 20 in scheduled and 20 in urgent surgeries, with the most frequent type being placenta accreta. The mean maternal age was 32 years, with a mean of 5h operating time, total bleeding 3135ml, and 3.5 units of packed cells transfused. There was no statistical difference when comparing these variables with re-interventions, hypovolaemic shock, and intensive care unit admission. Caesarean-hysterectomy with hypogastric artery ligation was the most frequent surgery performed.ConclusionsIn this hospital, scheduled and urgent surgical treatment of patients with placenta accreta show similar results, probably because the constant availability of resources and the experience obtained by the multidisciplinary team in all shifts. Nevertheless, make absolutely sure to perform elective surgery while having all the necessary resources