
Public health risk of some milk borne pathogens
Author(s) -
Mohamed M.A. Zeinhom,
Gihan K. Abdel-Latef
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
beni-seuf university journal of basic and applied sciences /beni-suef university journal of basic and applied sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2314-8543
pISSN - 2314-8535
DOI - 10.1016/j.bjbas.2014.10.006
Subject(s) - raw milk , salmonella , yersinia enterocolitica , veterinary medicine , biology , bulk tank , aeromonas , aeromonas hydrophila , isolation (microbiology) , microbiology and biotechnology , food science , bacteria , herd , medicine , genetics
A total of 150 samples of raw milk, 75 each of farm and market milk were collected from different farms and supermarkets in Beni-Suef Governorate, in addition to 30 stool samples from milk handlers and 25 milker's hand swabs were examined for the presence of Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Aeromonas and Yersinia. Isolates were identified biochemically and serologically. The obtained results revealed that E. coli was detected in a percentage of 26.7% and 16% in the examined raw market and bulk farm milk respectively, while in stool and hand swabs samples were 16.6% and 16%, respectively. E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. failed to be detected in any of the examined samples. Additionally, 45% and 16.7% of the recovered E. coli strains from the examined raw market and farm milk samples were enteropathogenic O166, while 55% and 83.3 were untypable, respectively. On the other hand 60% of human stool samples isolates were O 148 and 40% of the isolates were untypable, while 100% of the hand swab isolates were untypable. The results also exhibits isolation rate of Aeromonas hydrophila in a percentage of 24%, 13.3%, 10% and 16% from market milk, farm milk samples, stool and hand swabs respectively. While Yersinea enterocolitica represent 3.3% in the stool samples only. The public health significance of isolated strains as well as suggested control measures were discussed