z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Natural honey as a cryoprotectant to improve Arab stallion post-thawing sperm parameters
Author(s) -
Reda I. El-Sheshtawy,
Diya A. El-Badry,
Gamal A. El-Sisy,
Walid S. El-Nattat,
Amal M. Abo Almaaty
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
asian pacific journal of reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.167
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2305-0519
pISSN - 2305-0500
DOI - 10.1016/j.apjr.2016.06.004
Subject(s) - cryoprotectant , extender , sperm , acrosome , cryopreservation , andrology , semen , membrane integrity , biology , sperm motility , honey bee , zoology , chemistry , botany , biochemistry , medicine , membrane , fishery , embryo , organic chemistry , polyurethane
Objective: To investigate the effect of extender supplementation with different concentrations of a honey bee on post-thawed sperm motility, viability index, membrane and acrosome integrities in Arab stallion.Methods: Five ejaculates from each of four Arabian stallions were subjected to cryopreservation with a modified INRA-82, without any supplementation (control) or supplemented with 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5% honey bee. After thawing, all samples were maintained at 37 °C, while analyses were performed at 0, 1, and 2 and 3 h. Sperm motility percentage, viability index percentage, membrane integrity percentage and acrosome integrity percentage of each sample were determined by conventional laboratory methods.Results: Relative to the control group, supplementation with honey (2%, 3% and 4% significantly improved (P < 0.01 at least) post-thaw sperm motility, viability index (P < 0.001 at least) and had a positive effect on membrane integrity and intact acrosome percentage (P < 0.001 at least) at 0, 1, 2 and 3 h post-thawing. For all semen parameters, the lower concentration of honey (1%) and higher concentration (5%) did not show significant differences (P > 0.05) compared with the control.Conclusion: Honey bee supplementation in Arab stallion semen extenders provided a better protection of sperm parameters against cryopreservation injury, in comparison to the control groups

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here