Premium
Interruptions and Miscommunications in Surgery: An Observational Study
Author(s) -
Gillespie Brigid M.,
Chaboyer Wendy,
Fairweather Nicole
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
aorn journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.222
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1878-0369
pISSN - 0001-2092
DOI - 10.1016/j.aorn.2012.02.012
Subject(s) - observational study , psychological intervention , sample (material) , medicine , psychology , nursing , chemistry , chromatography
In surgery, as much as 30% of procedure‐specific information may be lost as a result of miscommunication. We assessed the relationship between interruptions, team familiarity, and miscommunications across a purposive sample of 160 surgical procedures in 10 specialties during a six‐month period. Descriptive analysis was used to quantify interruptions in respect to the source (ie, conversational, procedural) and type of miscommunication (ie, audience, purpose, occasion, content, experience). Results revealed an inverse correlation between the length of time that teams had worked together and the number of miscommunications in surgery (τ = −.33, P < .01). There was a positive correlation between the number of intraoperative interruptions and the number of miscommunications (τ = .30, P < .01). These results may help to inform the development of evidence‐based interventions designed to mitigate the effects of miscommunications in surgery.