z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DNA Methylome of Familial Breast Cancer Identifies Distinct Profiles Defined by Mutation Status
Author(s) -
James M. Flanagan,
Sibylle Cocciardi,
Nicola Waddell,
Cameron N. Johnstone,
Anna Marsh,
Stephen Henderson,
Peter T. Simpson,
Leonard Da Silva,
KumKum Khanna,
Sunil R. Lakhani,
Chris Boshoff,
Georgia ChenevixTrench
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the american journal of human genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.661
H-Index - 302
eISSN - 1537-6605
pISSN - 0002-9297
DOI - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.008
Subject(s) - dna methylation , biology , epigenetics , loss of heterozygosity , breast cancer , methylation , genetics , carcinogenesis , cancer research , gene , cancer , gene expression , allele
It is now understood that epigenetic alterations occur frequently in sporadic breast carcinogenesis, but little is known about the epigenetic alterations associated with familial breast tumors. We performed genome-wide DNA-methylation profiling on familial breast cancers (n = 33) to identify patterns of methylation specific to the different mutation groups (BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAx) or intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer (basal, luminal A, luminal B, HER2-amplified, and normal-like). We used methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) on Affymetrix promoter chips to interrogate methylation profiles across 25,500 distinct transcripts. Using a support vector machine classification algorithm, we demonstrated that genome-wide methylation profiles predicted tumor mutation status with estimated error rates of 19% (BRCA1), 31% (BRCA2), and 36% (BRCAx) but did not accurately predict the intrinsic subtypes defined by gene expression. Furthermore, using unsupervised hierarchical clustering, we identified a distinct subgroup of BRCAx tumors defined by methylation profiles. We validated these findings in the 33 tumors in the test set, as well as in an independent validation set of 47 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded familial breast tumors, by pyrosequencing and Epityper. Finally, gene-expression profiling and SNP CGH array previously performed on the same samples allowed full integration of methylation, gene-expression, and copy-number data sets, revealing frequent hypermethylation of genes that also displayed loss of heterozygosity, as well as of genes that show copy-number gains, providing a potential mechanism for expression dosage compensation. Together, these data show that methylation profiles for familial breast cancers are defined by the mutation status and are distinct from the intrinsic subtypes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom