z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Anatomical factors predicting lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Author(s) -
Mohammad Amir Khan,
Murli Lal,
Deep Par Kash,
Mudassir Hussain,
S.A.H. Rizvi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
african journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.174
H-Index - 11
eISSN - 1110-5704
pISSN - 1961-9987
DOI - 10.1016/j.afju.2015.09.006
Subject(s) - medicine , extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , clearance , renal function , ultrasound , lithotripsy , renal stone , extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy , intravenous urography , extracorporeal , urology , nuclear medicine , surgery , radiology , urinary system
ObjectiveTo determine the role of the lower pole infundibular parameters as predictors of stone clearance following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).Subjects and methodsBetween March 2001 and February 2004, 243 renal units in 239 patients with isolated lower calyceal stones were treated by ESWL. Stone-free status was assessed after 3 months by plain X-ray abdomen and a kidney ultrasound scan. Persistent stone fragments ≥6 months after the completion of treatment was defined as residual stone. Radiogaphic parameters were obtained from intravenous urography (IVU). SPSS version 15.0 was utilized for all statistical analysis.ResultsThe median age of all patients was 38 years (range: 20–70 years). The male to female ratio was 2.1:1.The mean stone size was 1.3±0.7cm. Overall, 144 renal units (60.9%) had undergone one or two sessions of ESWL, 43 (17.7%) 3, while 46 (18.9%) ≥4 sessions, with mean of 2.1 sessions.Stone-free rates differed significantly between favorable and unfavorable infundibular length (IL), and infundibular width (IW) (p value=0.01, p=0.0001, respectively). Infundibulopelvic (IP) angle had no statistically significant effect on stone-free rate (p=0.1).The effect of stone size on stone-free rate in two groups revealed better overall results in favorable anatomy group than in unfavorable group in stone sizes, 0.5–1.0cm, 1.1–1.5cm, 1.6–2cm and 2.1–2.5cm (76.7%, 87.5%, 100%, and 56.2% vs. 41.1%, 55.5%, 66.6%, and 50%; p=0.04, 0.10, 0.10, 0.80, respectively).ConclusionsThis study shows that lower infundibular length and width are significant anatomical factors in determining stone clearance following ESWL treatment of lower calyceal stones and these should be assessed before planning the treatment for lower calyceal stones

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom