Premium
Vaginal birth after cesarean section: management debate
Author(s) -
Chattopadhyay K.,
Sengupta B.S.,
Edress Y.B.,
Lambourne A.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90261-5
Subject(s) - cephalopelvic disproportion , medicine , vaginal birth , obstetrics , vaginal delivery , dehiscence , gynecology , pregnancy , caesarean section , surgery , genetics , biology
Obstetric performance of 1847 women with previous cesarean section (CS) during the years 1983 and 1984 were studied. Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) was attempted in 94% of females with one previous CS, 4% in those with two previous CS, and one among the 70 patients with three or more previous CS. VBAC was achieved in 51% of those with one previous CS. It was successful in 60% of parturients with CS for non‐recurrent causes, 36% of CS for cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and in 64% of those with a prior vaginal delivery. Uterine scar dehiscence was found in 0.9% of all patients with a previous CS. A failed attempt with Ventouse to achieve VBAC caused maximum maternal and perinatal morbidity.