Premium
Length/serum creatinine ratio does not predict measured creatinine clearance in critically ill children
Author(s) -
Fong Jane,
Johnston Santa,
Valentino Toni,
Notterman Daniel
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90197-3
Subject(s) - renal function , creatinine , urology , confidence interval , medicine , critically ill , urine
Objective Information regarding renal function is important in critically ill children to adjust the dosage of drugs that are eliminated by the kidneys. Methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on age and serum creatinine level have shown good agreement with measured creatinine clearance (CL CR ) in children without critical illness but have not been examined in critically ill children. Methods CL CR (24 hours) was measured (CL CR ‐measured) in 100 individuals (aged 5.6 years [range, 0.1 to 20.8 years]) admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. Urine was collected by indwelling bladder catheters. Serum levels were determined. CL CR was calculated (CL CR ‐measured) according to the standard formula. GFR was estimated (CL‐estimated) according to a published method, in which GFR is based on serum creatinine levels, patient length, and a constant that varies with the age and sex of the child. For each patient, the percentage difference between methods was calculated as the difference between the methods divided by the average obtained by the two methods and expressed as a percentage. Bias was calculated as the absolute value of the percentage difference. Results CL CR ‐measured and CL‐estimated were significantly correlated (CL CR ‐measured = 0.57 · CL‐estimated + 16.8; r = 0.68; p < 0.001). However, CL‐estimated was greater than CL CR ‐measured in 84 patients. The difference ranged from −230 to +123 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (mean −25.9 ml/min/1.73 m 2 [95% confidence interval, −18.1 to 33.7 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ]). The mean percentage difference between the methods was also large (−38.1% [95% confidence interval, −47.1% to 29.2%]) and ranged from −153.2% to 102.1%. The mean bias was 45.2% (95% confidence interval, 37.7% to 52.8%). In 36 of 100 patients the discrepancy between the two methods was greater than 50%. Adjusting for weight percentile, as a proxy for abnormal muscle mass, did not improve the model. Conclusion A method to estimate GFR in children that is based on age and sex, but not critical illness, does not correspond with measured 24‐hour CL CR . Use of this method to adjust dosage of drugs eliminated by the kidney might result in significant overdosage in most critically ill children. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1995) 58 , 192–197; doi: