Premium
Regional deposition of inhaled 11 C‐nicotine vapor in the human airway as visualized by positron emission tomography
Author(s) -
Bergström Mats,
Nordberg Agneta,
Lunell Erik,
Antoni Gunnar,
Långström Bengt
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90156-6
Subject(s) - inhalation , buccal administration , medicine , respiratory tract , anesthesia , inhaler , nuclear medicine , nicotine , stomach , respiratory system , pharmacology , asthma
The deposition of 11 C‐nicotine in the respiratory tract from a nicotine vapor inhaler was studied by means of positron emission tomography (PET) in an intrasubject comparison of six healthy smokers using two modes of inhalation: one with shallow, frequent inhalations (“buccal mode”) and one with deep inhalations (“pulmonary mode”). An average of 15% of the radioactivity was released from the vapor inhaler after 5 minutes of inhalation. Approximately 45% of the dose released was found in the oral cavity. A significant amount of radioactivity, 10%, was observed in the esophagus, suggesting transfer of a major fraction of the dose to the stomach. Only a minor fraction, 5%, was found in the lungs, followed by 2% in the bronchi and 1% in the trachea. The deposition in the oral cavity closely followed a linear pattern during the 5 minutes of inhalation and was followed by a rapid elimination from the oral cavity, with an average half‐life of 18 minutes. Only 8% of the dose released remained in the oral cavity 45 minutes after the end of inhalation. On the other hand, the dose fraction of about 14% distributed into the body tissue compartment at the end of inhalation had risen to 60% at that late time point. No statistically or clinically important differences were observed between the buccal and the pulmonary mode of inhalation in either deposition pattern or elimination rates. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1995) 57 , 309–317; doi: