z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis Better Than Conventional Open Plating for Humeral Shaft Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
Author(s) -
Kumar Keshav,
Anurag Baghel,
Vishal Kumar,
Deepak Neradi,
Kumar Kaustubh,
Prabhaker Mishra
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
indian journal of orthopaedics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.434
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1998-3727
pISSN - 0019-5413
DOI - 10.1007/s43465-021-00413-6
Subject(s) - medicine , cochrane library , randomized controlled trial , internal fixation , surgery , meta analysis , palsy , alternative medicine , pathology
The aim of systematic review and meta-analysis was to find out whether minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is better than open reduction and internal plate fixation (ORIF) in terms of functional outcome, achieving union (union time and incidence of non-union), intraoperative parameters (surgical duration, blood loss, and radiation exposure), and complications (iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and infection) for humeral shaft fractures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here