z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Custard apple puree, fructooligosaccharide and soy protein hydrolysate as alternative ingredients in low carb pound cake
Author(s) -
Adrielle Reis de Souza,
Márcio Schmiele
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of food science and technology/journal of food science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.656
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 0975-8402
pISSN - 0022-1155
DOI - 10.1007/s13197-021-05155-9
Subject(s) - food science , maltodextrin , hydrolysate , chemistry , sugar , sucrose , hydrolysis , chromatography , spray drying , biochemistry
The optimum formulation of a low carb pound cake was determined using alternative ingredients to replace the main sources of digestible carbohydrates in the standard formulation. Surface response methodology was a useful tool in the investigation of the use of custard apple puree (CAP), fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and soy protein hydrolysate (SPH) as partial or total replacers for wheat flour, sucrose, and powdered whole milk, respectively. The quality of pound cakes was assessed by measuring the batter and cake properties. The percentage of ingredients substitution affected the specific gravity of the batter, cakes specific volume, crumb firmness, instrumental color parameters ( L *, a *, b *) and number and circularity of alveoli from pound cake slices. The model equations developed can be used for predicting the quality of the pound cake. The optimum formulation of low carb pound cake with 40.98% of CAP, 94.94% of FOS and 100% of SPH, in replacement of wheat flour, sucrose and powdered whole milk, respectively, has a 93.70% of desirability. A reduction of 60.67% in digestible carbohydrates was reached. The main reduction occurs in the starch content due to the wheat flour replacement and the non-reducing sugar content due to the sucrose partial substitution. The low carb pound cake had a moderate glycemic index (60.08%), a low glycemic load (4.69%) and accepted by the judges through sensory analysis, with an acceptability index of 72.08 ± 3.97%.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here