Open AccessValidation of Point of Care Hemoglobin Estimation Among Pregnant Women Using Digital Hemoglobinometers (HemoCue 301 and HemoCue 201+) as Compared with Auto-Analyzer
Author(s) -
Kapil Yadav,
Shashi Kant,
Gomathi Ramaswamy,
Farhad Ahamed,
Olivia Marie Jacob,
Himani Vyas,
Ravneet Kaur,
Sumit Malhotra,
Partha Haldar
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
indian journal of hematology and blood transfusion/indian journal of hematology and blood transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.213
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 0974-0449
pISSN - 0971-4502
DOI - 10.1007/s12288-019-01196-5
Subject(s) - medicine , autoanalyzer , concordance , gold standard (test) , hemoglobin , point of care , obstetrics , anemia , point of care testing , hematology analyzer , gynecology , immunology , pathology
Accurate and reliable point of care tests (POCTs) for hemoglobin estimation is essential for early diagnosis and management of anemia. This study was aimed to assess the reliability and validity of two versions of digital hemoglobinometer (HemoCue 201+ and HemoCue 301) compared to the gold standard Sysmex autoanalyzer for hemoglobin estimation. Pregnant women attending antenatal clinics of Primary Health Centre and a Sub Divisional Hospital in Haryana, India, were recruited. After obtaining consent, capillary blood samples were collected and tested for hemoglobin levels with digital hemoglobinometers (HemoCue 201+ and HemoCue 301). Among same pregnant women venous blood was collected and hemoglobin levels were estimated using autoanalyzer. Validity and reliability of POCTs compared to Sysmex autoanalyzer were reported. Of the 102 pregnant women included in the study, 44 (43%) were primigravida, with mean (SD) age of 23.3 (3.4) years. The mean (SD) of difference in hemoglobin levels using HemoCue 201+ was - 0.53 (1.01) and using HemoCue 301 was - 0.25 (0.85) g/dL as compared to auto-analyzer. Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.80 for HemoCue 201+ and 0.85 for HemoCue 301. Weighted Cohen's Kappa indicated moderate degree of agreement with the gold standard. Sensitivity (HemoCue 201+: 93%; HemoCue 301: 90%) and specificity (HemoCue 201: 76% HemoCue 301: 80%) for detecting anemia was similar for both the POCT devices. The digital hemoglobinometers used in the study had moderate degree of agreement and concordance with the autoanalyzer for hemoglobin estimation. HemoCue 301 had higher validity as compared to HemoCue 201+.